Recently in Berlin more than 15 countries, along with the European Commission, the Gates Foundation and others, pledged over US$7.5 billion to buy vaccines for the children of the world’s poorest countries for the next five years.
Canada alone pledged 500 million to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. While this is great news for the millions of children living in the 73 countries supported by Gavi, there were other big winners: the pharmaceutical companies that benefit from the soaring vaccine prices they charge for vaccines worldwide.On January 20, Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) released the second edition of its vaccine pricing report, The Right Shot, which showed that in the poorest countries, the price to vaccinate a child is now a colossal 68 times more expensive than it was in 2001, with many parts of the world unable to afford new high-priced vaccines…
One of the new vaccines Gavi is tasked with introducing is the pneumonia vaccine (PCV), which aims to combat a major childhood killer in developing countries. A dramatic 37 per cent (or US$2.8 billion) of the total amount raised for Gavi last week from taxpayers and private foundations will go to pay for just this one high-priced vaccine, which today is produced by only two pharmaceutical giants: GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer. The two companies have made more than US$19 billion in sales off of the vaccine since its launch, yet still charge developing countries unaffordable and unsustainable prices. It’s important to point out that this vaccine was initially developed for children in wealthy countries, and its research and development costs have long been recovered.
Last month, MSF urged the two major Pharmaceutical companies, GSK and Pfizer to cut the price of the pneumonia vaccine in half, to $5 per child (inclusive of all three doses). This is only slightly less than the $6 price ($2/dose) announced by the Indian manufacturer Serum Institute for a version it plans to introduce in the next few years. The stark difference in prices between developed countries, some of whom pay up to $336 per child, and the prices paid in developing countries only illustrates how highly inflated vaccine prices are in wealthy and even middle-income countries, compared to what it could cost to make the vaccine.
Ahead of the Berlin conference, GSK and Pfizer could have significantly reduced the price of the pneumonia vaccine for developing countries. Instead, both companies decided to continue charging donor countries and developing countries prices they won’t be able to afford long term. GSK offered a 10-year price freeze for countries that eventually lose donor support (but at the high price), and Pfizer offered a slim six per cent price reduction (from US$9.90 to US$9.30 for three doses). These prices are still far too high for developing countries, and may force governments to make hard choices about which diseases they can and can’t afford to protect their children against.
It’s not too late to put public health over profit and make use of the collective power of all the countries that gathered and gave so generously in Berlin. We now need a strong call for more affordable and sustainable vaccines prices from Pharmaceutical companies for developing countries, donor countries and Gavi.